考虑土拱效应的EPS板减压砂土挡墙土压力研究

Study on the earth pressure of sand on retaining walls with EPS blocks considering the arching effect

  • 摘要: 在混凝土挡墙和墙后回填土之间放置土工泡沫(简称“EPS”)板,利用EPS板的压缩变形能够有效减少作用在挡墙墙体上的土压力,但同时也导致这类挡墙(简称“EPS板减压挡墙”)墙后土压力的分布及大小与刚性挡土墙大不相同。通过开展EPS板减压砂土挡墙模型试验,研究了挡墙墙后回填砂土的位移模式和土压力分布规律,在此基础上提出了能够考虑土拱效应的EPS板减压砂土挡墙土压力的计算方法,并进一步分析了EPS板密度和厚度对墙后土压力的影响。结果表明:上覆荷载作用下,EPS板减压砂土挡墙墙后填土中产生近似三角形的滑楔体,滑楔体滑动面贯穿至EPS板中部;EPS板减压砂土挡墙土压力呈非线性分布,随着上覆荷载的增大,土压力从随墙深的增加变化为随墙深的减小;EPS板厚度越大、密度越小,EPS板减压砂土挡墙墙后土压力越小,当墙后土压力减少至主动土压力,EPS厚度的进一步增大和密度的进一步减少均不再产生影响。研究结果可为减压挡墙结构中土工泡沫板的优化设计提供理论支撑。

     

    Abstract: Expanded polystyrene geofoam (EPS) blocks, placed between a retaining wall and the backfill soil, can effectively reduce the earth pressure acting on the wall due to their compressibility. However, this also leads to a distribution and magnitude of earth pressure behind such retaining walls (hereafter referred to as “EPS block-reduced-pressure retaining walls”) that differ significantly from those of rigid retaining walls. In this study, model tests were conducted to investigate the displacement pattern of the sand backfill and the distribution of earth pressure behind retaining walls with EPS blocks. Based on these observations, a calculation method for earth pressure considering the arching effect was proposed. Furthermore, the influence of EPS block density and thickness on earth pressure was analyzed. The results indicate that under a surcharge load, an approximately triangular sliding wedge forms in the backfill behind the wall, with the sliding surface extending into the middle of the EPS block. The earth pressure distribution on the EPS block-reduced-pressure retaining wall is nonlinear; as the surcharge load increases, the earth pressure varies from increasing to decreasing with wall depth. The greater the thickness and the lower the density of the EPS block, the smaller the earth pressure behind the wall. When the earth pressure is reduced to the level of active earth pressure, further increases in EPS thickness or reductions in density have no additional effect. These findings provide theoretical support for the optimized design of geofoam inclusions in reduced-pressure retaining wall structures.

     

/

返回文章
返回